BRADLEY v. DC SUPERIOR COURT et al

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 5/17/2011. (ls, )

•

FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MAr 252011
cClert. u.s. District &Bankr

Latonya M. Bradley,
Plaintiff,
v.

D.C. Superior Court, et aI.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ourta tor the Dlstrtct at Cofu~~ra

Civil Action No.

11

,~6f.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its review of the plaintiff s pro se complaint and
application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will
be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring
dismissal of an action "at any time" the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction).
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and two Superior Court judges. She has
stated no facts about the named defendants, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review any of
their rulings. See 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Fleming v. United

States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1150 (1995). A separate
Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: May

n,

United States District Judge
2011