TREVINO v. TEXAS VITAL STATISTICS

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 5/17/2011. (ls, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED MAY 262011 ,.,!!~ u.s. District & Bankruptcy VU... III Flordelisa I. Trevino, Petitioner, v. Texas Vital Statistics, DSHS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) for the DIstrict of Columbia Civil Action No. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on review of the petition, brought pro se, and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the case will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the court to dismiss an action "at any time" it determines that subject matter jurisdiction is wanting). The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Petitioner, a resident of Olongapo City, Philippines, has filed a "Petition to Amend Certificate of Death as Likewise Motion to Have a Copy of Modified True-Certified Copy of the Death Certificate." She seeks to compel such relief from a Texas agency. The federal courts may compel federal officials to act under certain circumstances. See 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Such authority does not extend to state officials or agencies. Petitioner's recourse lies, if at all, in the Texas state court system. Because the petition presents neither a federal question nor a basis for diversity jurisdiction, the case will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. United States District Judge DATE: May!::J.-, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?