FREEMAN vs. CHARVIS ET AL
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION to 10 ORDER. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/25/2011. (lcjeb1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 11-1046 (JEB)
HUGO CHARVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On or around June 6, 2011, Plaintiff Mark Freeman filed an incomprehensible Complaint
naming scores of Defendants and mentioning everything from his New Jersey high school
records to his decision to decline matching funds when running for President of the United States
to a settlement conference in the Virgin Islands. Defendant Brit Bryant filed a Motion to
Dismiss on July 14, 2011, and the Court that same day directed Plaintiff to respond by August
18, 2011, or face the risk that the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has yet to respond to
Bryant’s Motion.
Although Defendant raises many compelling arguments as to the deficiency of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, the Court need not address them. Instead, the Court will, by separate Order this day,
find that Plaintiff has conceded the Motion under LCvR 7(b), thereby resulting in dismissal.
/s/ James E. Boasberg
JAMES E. BOASBERG
United States District Judge
Date: August 25, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?