FREEMAN vs. CHARVIS ET AL
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION to 15 ORDER. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/23/2011. (lcjeb1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 11-1046 (JEB)
HUGO CHARVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On or around June 6, 2011, Plaintiff Mark Freeman filed an incomprehensible Complaint
naming scores of Defendants and mentioning everything from his New Jersey high school
records to his decision to decline matching funds when running for President of the United States
to a settlement conference in the Virgin Islands. Defendant Todd Newman filed a Motion to
Dismiss on August 15, 2011, and the Court that same day directed Plaintiff to respond by
September 14, 2011, or face the risk that the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has yet to
respond to Newman’s Motion.
Although Defendant raises many compelling arguments as to the deficiency of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, the Court need not address them. Instead, the Court will, as with Defendant Bryant’s
Motion to Dismiss, by separate Order this day, find that Plaintiff has conceded the Motion under
LCvR 7(b), thereby resulting in dismissal.
/s/ James E. Boasberg
JAMES E. BOASBERG
United States District Judge
Date: September 23, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?