JONES v. BEAVER et al

Filing 42

DISMISSAL ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants Kevin Carr and Awthentik are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as parties to this action; it is further ORDERED that Jeremy Beaver and L isten Vision, LLC's motion to dismiss 22 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motions for summary judgment 36 and for entry of default 39 , 40 are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App.P.4(a). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 4/24/2012. (see dismissal order) (kc )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TERRANCE JONES, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY BEAVER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 11-1620 (RJL) tL-- DISMISSAL ORDER (April 2012) iv, For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants Kevin Carr and Awthentik are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as parties to this action; it is further ORDERED that Jeremy Beaver and Listen Vision, LLC's motion to dismiss [Dkt. #22] is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs motions for summary judgment [Dkt. #36] and for entry of default [Dkt. # 39-40] are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). SO ORDERED. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?