MEDLEY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying final order issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 4/9/12.(ah)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________
)
)
JUAN ANTHONY MEDLEY,
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al.,
)
)
)
Respondents.
)
__________________________________________)

Civil Action No. 11-1893 (RWR)

MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 9, 2011, petitioner was ordered to respond by January 20, 2012, to
respondents’ opposition to his application for a writ of habeas corpus or risk dismissal of the
case. On February 6, 2012, petitioner was given additional advisements and ordered to respond
by March 5, 2012, or risk dismissal of the case. Petitioner has neither complied with the orders
nor sought additional time to do so.1 He therefore has conceded the United States Parole
Commission’s (“USPC”) argument establishing its jurisdiction over petitioner at the time of his
parole revocation. See USPC’s Opp’n to Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. # 8] at
5-8. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: April 9, 2012

1

_________/s/_____________
RICHARD W. ROBERTS
United States District Judge

Because petitioner failed in his responsibility to maintain a current address of record,
the March 5, 2012, order was returned “as undeliverable.” Clerk’s Dkt. Entries 11, 12.