WELL GO USA, INC. v. UNKNOWN PARTICIPANTS IN FILESHARING SWARM IDENTIFIED BY HASH B7FEC872874D0CC9B1372ECE5ED07AD7420A3BBB
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 9] is ADOPTED. And for the reasons set forth in the Report, it is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice. See order for details. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 7/26/2013. (lcabj2)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________
)
WELL GO USA, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNKNOWN PARTICIPANTS IN
)
FILESHARING SWARM IDENTIFIED
)
BY HASH: B7FEC872874DOCC9B)
1372ECE5ED07AD7420A3BBB,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
Civil Action No. 11-1946 (ABJ)
ORDER
On July 8, 2013, Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola issued a Report and a
Recommendation [Dkt. # 9] that plaintiff’s case be dismissed with prejudice for failure to
comply with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule
72.3(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), any written objections to Magistrate Judge
Facciola’s Report and Recommendation were due within 14 days.
The Report and
Recommendation informed plaintiff that “[f]ailure to file timely objections to the findings and
recommendations set forth in this report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the
District Court adopting such findings and recommendations.” Report at 1–2, citing Thomas v.
Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Eighteen days have passed since Magistrate Judge Facciola’s Report
and Recommendation, and plaintiff has failed to file any objections.
Therefore, after reviewing Magistrate Judge Facciola’s report, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 9] is ADOPTED; and for the
reasons set forth in the Report, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s case is dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
AMY BERMAN JACKSON
United States District Judge
DATE: July 26, 2013
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?