CLARK v. COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION et al

Filing 28

ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant Insight Globals, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss 4 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that defendant Computer Science Corporation's Motio n to Dismiss 6 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that defendant Kforce, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Failure to State a Claim for Which Relief May Be Granted 11 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that defendant Insig ht Global Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 22 and Kforce Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 26 are both DENIED as moot; it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint and Remand 23 is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 8/1/2013. (see order) (kc )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)
)
)
)

ANTHONY CLARK,
Plaintiff,

)

v.

Civil Case No. 12-01310 (RJL)

)
)
)
)

COMPUTER SCIENCE CORP., et al.,
Defendants.

<) ""<>RDER

August

L. 2013 [## 4, 6, 11, 22, 23, 26]

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendant Insight Global, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 4] is
GRANTED; is it further
ORDERED that defendant Computer Science Corporation's Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff's Complaint [Dkt. # 6] is GRANTED; it is further

ORDERED that defendant Kforce, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint
for Failure to State a Claim for Which Relief May Be Granted [Dkt. # 11] is GRANTED;
it is further

ORDERED that defendant Insight Global, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment
[Dkt. # 22] and Kforce Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 26] are both

DENIED as moot; it is further

13

ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint and Remand [Dkt. # 23]

is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.

14