HICKS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on August 30, 2013. (AG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ERIC A. HICKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS,
Defendants.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civ. Action No. 13-0033 (ESH)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment
[ECF No. 14]. By Order of July 25, 2013, plaintiff was advised to respond to defendant’s
motion by August 26, 2013, or risk dismissal of the case on what the Court might treat as a
conceded motion. Plaintiff has neither filed a response to the pending motion to dismiss nor
sought additional time to do so. Therefore, the Court will treat the motion as conceded and
dismiss the case. See FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 68 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (discretion lies wholly
with the district court to grant motion to dismiss as conceded). A separate Order accompanies
this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: August 30, 2013
___________/s/___________
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?