FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., et al v. AEREOKILLER LLC, et al

Filing 59

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by FILMON X, LLC, FILMON.COM, INC,, FILMON.TV NETWORKS, INC.,, FILMON.TV, INC. re 54 Order on Motion to Modify DEFENDANT FILMON XS REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT RE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF THE SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. (Baker, Ryan)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_______________________________________
Civil No. 1:13-cv-00758 (RMC)

FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., et al.
Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants,
v.

Hon. Rosemary M. Collyer
Civil No. 1:13-cv-00758 (RMC)

FILMON X LLC, et al.
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.
_______________________________________
DEFENDANT FILMON X’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT RE ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF THE
SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
In light of the extreme nature of contempt, FilmOn X1 respectfully requests the
opportunity for oral argument regarding this Court’s Order to Show Cause why Defendant
should not be in held in contempt of the September 5, 2013 preliminary injunction. FilmOn X
takes contempt seriously and requests oral argument at this time in order to address factual and
other discrepancies in plaintiffs’ response to this Court’s order to show cause. [Dkt. 57.]
FilmOn X requests a full and complete opportunity to address this Court’s concerns.

1

“FilmOn X” or “Defendants” refers collectively herein to defendants FilmOn X LLC, FilmOn.TV Networks, Inc.,
FilmOn.TV, Inc. and FilmOn.com, Inc.

FILMON X’S REQUEST FOR
ORAL ARGUMENT RE OSC

October 25, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Ryan G. Baker
Ryan G. Baker
BAKER MARQUART LLP
10990 Wilshire Blvd., Fourth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90024
[phone] (telephone)
[phone] (facsimile)
Bar No.: 200344
/s/ Kerry J. Davidson
LAW OFFICE OF KERRY J. DAVIDSON
1738 Elton Road, Suite 113
Silver Spring, Maryland 20903
[phone] (telephone)
[phone](facsimile)
Bar No.: 456431
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim
Plaintiffs FilmOn X, LLC, FilmOn.TV, Inc.,
FilmOn.TV Networks, Inc., and FilmOn.com, Inc.

2

FILMON X’S REQUEST FOR
ORAL ARGUMENT RE OSC