Filing 80

WITHDRAWAL of Motion by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. re #78 MOTION for Protective Order filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. . (Bridges, Andrew)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL; NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.; and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, Case No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC-DAR WITHDRAWAL OF PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [DKT. NO. 78] Filed: August 6, 2013 Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant. Defendant-Counterclaimant Public.Resource.Org withdraws its motion for a protective order [Dkt. No. 78]. It had sought an order deferring the depositions of Public Resource and Carl Malamud that the ASTM Plaintiffs noticed for February 26 and 27, 2015 until after a decision on the pending motion for discovery consolidation of the ASTM and AERA cases [Dkt. No. 33 in American Educational Research Association, Inc. et al. v. Public.Resource.Org, No. 1:14-cv00857-TSC-DAR (filed May 23, 2014)]. Because the deposition of Public Resource by the ASTM Plaintiffs alone has begun without either discovery consolidation or a protective order in place, the motion is now moot. Dated: February 26, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Andrew P. Bridges Andrew P. Bridges (admitted) Kathleen Lu (pro hac vice) Matthew B. Becker (pro hac vice) FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 David Halperin (D.C. Bar No. 426078) 1530 P Street NW Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 905-3434 Mitchell L. Stoltz (D.C. Bar No. 978149) Corynne McSherry (pro hac vice) ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 Attorneys for Defendant-Counterclaimant Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?