SNYDER et al v. CASTRO

Filing 20

ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on July 8, 2015. (lcesh2)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) JANET L. SNYDER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) JULIAN CASTRO, in his capacity as ) SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ) DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN ) DEVELOPMENT, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) Civil Action No. 15-0568 (ESH) ORDER On June 12, 2015, defendant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint as moot. (Def.’s Mot. To Dismiss For Mootness, June 12, 2015 [ECF No. 18].) Plaintiffs’ response to this motion was due on or before June 29, 2015, but plaintiffs have neither responded nor sought an extension of time in which to respond. The Local Rules for this Court provide that if a party fails to file an opposition to a motion “within the prescribed time, the Court may treat the motion as conceded.” LCvR 7(b); see Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1295 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (“[W]here the district court relies on the absence of a response as a basis for treating the motion as conceded, we honor its enforcement of the rule.” (quoting Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir.1997))). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED as conceded; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED. /s/ Ellen Segal Huvelle ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge Date: July 8, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?