CAMILO v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying final order issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/19/15.(ah)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RUFINA O. CAMILO,
Plaintiff,
v.

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 15-0641 (RC)

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF
No. 4. On June 11, 2015, plaintiff Rufina O. Camilo was ordered to respond to the motion by
July 20, 2015, or risk summary dismissal of the case. See Order, ECF No. 6. Ms. Camilo has
not complied with the order and has not sought additional time to do so. Hence this case will be
dismissed on what is considered to be a conceded motion to dismiss. See Twelve John Does v.
District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (“Where the district court relies on the
absence of a response as a basis for treating a motion as conceded, [the District of Columbia
Circuit] honor[s] its enforcement” of the local rule.); accord Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d
1291, 1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004); FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 1997). A
separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
________/s/____________
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS
United States District Judge
Date: August 19, 2015