PIERCE v. CARTER

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Plaintiff's 20 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint that includes only the allegations relating to Count III, hostile wo rk environment in violation of Title VII, Count IV, violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Count V, retaliation in violation of the Rehabilitation Act. Any allegations regarding plaintiffs proposed Bivens claim shall not be included. Plai ntiff shall have until July 5, 2017 to file a revised First Amended Complaint that comports with this Order. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint by July 26, 2017. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 6/16/2017. (lcabj2)

In His Official Capacity as
Secretary of the Department of Defense

et. seq
see

Bivens

Id.

see
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics

Bivens

create
¶

Bivens

Bivens

Bivens

Bivens

Bivens

Bivens

Bivens
See, e.g. Bame v. Clark
Bivens

Lederman v. United States

Payne
v. Gov’t of D.C.

id.
Bivens

Wormley v. United States

see

See

Crane v. N.Y. Zoological Soc.

First Chicago Int’l v. United Exch’g Co.

Int’l Shoe Co. v. State of Wash.

Milliken v. Meyer
Quality Air Servs., LLC v.
Jackson v. Loews Wash.

Milwaukee Valve Co.
Cinemas, Inc.

Id.

see
Firestone v. Firestone

Atchinson v. District of Columbia
Foman v. Davis

Rumber v. District of Columbia

James

Madison Ltd. v. Ludwig

Bowden v. United States

Brown v. Marsh

Ortiz v. Jordan

Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Farmer v. Moritsugu

Id.

Harlow

Pearson v.
Callahan

id.

Id.

Anderson v. Creighton

Hunter v. Bryant

Bame v. Dillard
Saucier v. Katz

Ashcroft v. al-Kidd
Pearson

See Saucier

truthful

Franks v. Delaware

Franks
District of Columbia

Lane v.

Hunter
id.

Anderson

Bivens

Malley v. Briggs
arguendo

and

Bivens