COCKRUM et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. et al
Filing
49
RESPONSE re 46 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply filed by ROGER STONE. (Buschel, Robert)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ROY COCKRUM, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-1370-ESH
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.,
ROGER STONE,
Defendants.
DEFENDANT ROGER STONE’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY
Defendant Roger Stone opposes Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a surreply. (ECF No.
46-1). Stone adopts Defendant Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.’s opposition to Plaintiffs’
motion filed at (ECF No. 47).
Stone wishes to add that Plaintiffs also had the benefit of advocating amici at the
pleadings stages of this case in addition to agreement to add excess page numbers to their
opposition to the respective motions to dismiss. Because Plaintiffs had a full opportunity to brief
the issues in the motions to dismiss, Plaintiffs’ request for a surreply should be denied.
1
Dated: January 22, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Robert Buschel
Robert C. Buschel
Robert C. Buschel**
Counsel of Record
(FL Bar No. 0063436)
BUSCHEL GIBBONS , P.A.
ONE FINANCIAL PLAZA – SUITE 1300
100 S.E. THIRD AVENUE
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33394
(954) 530-5301
BUSCHEL@BGLAW-PA.COM
L. Peter Farkas
(DDC Bar No. 52944)
HALLORAN FARKAS & KITTILA, LLP
1101 30TH STREET, NW
SUITE 500
WASHINGTON, DC 20007
(202) 559-1700
PF@HFK.LAW
Grant J. Smith**
(FL Bar No. 935212)
STRATEGYSMITH, P.A.
401 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD
SUITE 130-120
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301
(954) 328-9064
GSMITH@STRATEGYSMITH.COM
Counsel for Roger Stone
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on January 22, 2018 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of
Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all registered
parties.
/s/ Robert Buschel
Robert C. Buschel
Counsel for Roger Stone
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?