Filing 6

MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court will DISMISS this action and direct the Clerk of Court to terminate this case. See document for details. A separate Order 7 will issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/30/2017. (lcrdm2, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GLEN GARY GRAY, III, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1750 (RDM) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Federal inmate Glen Gray, proceeding pro se, brought this action against the Federal Bureau of Prisons. In an earlier Order, the Court concluded that Gray’s complaint “d[id] not allege any facts that would allow the Court to discern the substance of Gray’s claims or to determine whether, if true, his allegations would entitle him to relief,” and thus failed to comply with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 5 at 2 (citing Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016)). The Court sua sponte dismissed Gray’s complaint without prejudice and granted him leave to file an amended complaint that complied with the dictates of Rule 8 and 12(b)(6). Id. Gray’s amended complaint was due on or before November 15, 2017. Id. More than two weeks have elapsed since that deadline, and the Court has received neither a response to its previous Order nor an amended pleading. It appears that Gray no longer intends to prosecute his case. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action and direct the Clerk of Court to terminate this case. A separate order will issue. /s/ Randolph D. Moss RANDOLPH D. MOSS United States District Judge Date: November 30, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?