NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration Declaration of Carmen Watkins, #3 Declaration Declaration of Earl Graham, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service)(Zieve, Allison)
Case 1:20-cv-02295-TSC Document 8 Filed 09/01/20 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Civil Action No. 20-cv-2295 (TSC)
PLAINITFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTON
Pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 65.1(c),
plaintiff National Association for the Advancement of Colored People hereby moves for a
preliminary injunction requiring defendants United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy to
rescind changes to postal service announced in the July 10, 2020, “PMG Expectations and Plan”
and “Pivot.” Defendants’ counsel has been consulted and advises that Defendants do not consent
to this relief.
In support of this motion, Plaintiff submits the accompanying (1) memorandum of law,
(2) Declarations of Carmen Watkins and Earl Graham, and (3) a proposed order.
Dated: September 1, 2020
Samuel Spital (D.D.C. Bar No. SS4839)
Rachel Kleinman (NY Bar No. 4417903)
Monique Lin-Luse (NY Bar No. 5671920)
J. Zachery Morris (NY Bar No. 5392196)
John S. Cusick (NY Bar No. 5585245)
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE &
EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
/s/ Allison M. Zieve
Allison M. Zieve (DC Bar No. 424786)
Matthew A. Seligman (DC Bar No. 1018889)
PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP
1600 20th Street NW
Washington, DC 20009
Case 1:20-cv-02295-TSC Document 8 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 2
40 Rector Street, 5th Floor
New York, NY 10006
Counsel for Plaintiff NAACP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?