MOUSEN YISAK ADEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 24

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 3/10/2025. (zmtm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MOUSEN YISAK ADEN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

Civil Action No. 25-0245 (UNA)

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s in forma pauperis
application, his pro se complaint, and motions for injunctive relief. It appears that plaintiff, the
supposed “Raymon Roman the chief Deusch who[] owns the office [of] the royal priesthood,”
Compl. at 5, attempts to bring this action on behalf of his “client and adherent Prince [C]onley
Fair,” id. The purported cause of action pertains to “the economic structure of the world banks,”
id. at 4, which allegedly have been “taken over by jews that are cousins to the arabians that have
the oil,” id., and “hand in hand they control world economics,” id. Plaintiff is “not happy about
it.” Id. Among other relief, plaintiff demands a “restraining order for Donald [T]rump and the
Jewish ran Us Military to let us get our shit together and put where we put.” Id. at 5. He also
demands that the former and current Presidents of the United States “inform International
[M]onetary Fund to open” an account for him. Id.
Under the statute governing in forma pauperis proceedings, the Court is required to
dismiss a case “at any time” it determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Because the instant complaint
falls far short of stating a viable claim, it is subject to dismissal. See McGuire v. U.S. District
Court, No. 10-cv-0696, 2010 WL 1855858, at *1 (D.D.C. May 4, 2010) (summarily dismissing
1

complaint under § 1915(e)(2) because it was “largely incoherent and nonsensical”); cf. Neitzke v.
Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A] complaint, containing . . . factual allegations and legal
conclusions . . . lack[ing] an arguable basis either in law or in fact” shall be dismissed.).
The Court will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [2], dismiss the
complaint without prejudice, and deny as moot plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief [4] [13]
[21]. A separate order will issue.

DATE: March 10, 2025

/s/
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER
United States District Judge

2