JICARILLA v. USA

Filing 275

ORDER granting 273 Motion to Amend/Correct Protective Order. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.

Download PDF
In The United States Court of Federal Claims No. 02-25L (Filed: April 8, 2011) __________ JICARILLA APACHE NATION, formerly JICARILLA APACHE TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. _________ ORDER _________ On March 30, 2011, defendant filed an unopposed motion to modify or amend the protective order. This motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, paragraph one of the court's February 19, 2010, protective order is modified to read as follows: " 1. Scope. This order shall govern documents that, in the Order dated July 3, 2009, Dkt. Nos. 211, 216, this court has directed that defendant produce to plaintiff. Also, this Order shall govern all other documents hereinafter produced by defendant in this case in conformance with the decision in In re United States, 590 F.3d 1305 (Fed. Cir. 2009), and that defendant claims to be protected from discovery by virtue of the attorney-client privilege, in the absence of the application of the fiduciary exception, as defined in In re United States. Further, this order shall govern any deposition testimony given hereinafter that defendant claims to be protected from discovery by virtue of the attorney-client privilege, in the absence of the application of the fiduciary exception, as defined in In re United States. This order shall not apply to document numbers 13 and 14 described in Appendix A of Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States, 88 Fed. Cl. 1, 24 (2009) or to other copies of those documents." In all other respects, the court's February 19, 2010, protective order remains unmodified and in full force and effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?