SOLOW et al v. USA

Filing 412

SCHEDULING ORDER: Absent the filing of the parties' motion to approve their settlement agreement, on or before 2/26/2021, the parties are directed to FILE a joint status report indicating the status of settlement proceedings. If settlement proceedings have reached an impasses, the parties' status report shall propose a plan on the remaining claims in this case. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made.

Download PDF
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 06-872C (E-Filed: February 19, 2021) GERALD K. KANDEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On February 16, 2021, the parties filed their joint status report indicating the status of settlement proceedings in this matter. See ECF No. 411. Therein, the parties report that they “have agreed on all the terms and the wording of a settlement agreement with respect to former employees of the Panama Canal Commission. However, additional time is required to permit Government counsel to obtain necessary consideration by authorized officials.” Id. at 1. In that regard, the parties request that the court grant an additional ten days, until February 26, 2021, “to permit Government counsel to obtain the necessary supervisory consideration, and if supervisory approval is obtained, within which to submit the settlement for the [c]ourt’s approval.” Id. at 1. Absent the filing of the parties’ motion to approve their settlement agreement, on or before February 26, 2021, the parties are directed to FILE a joint status report indicating the status of settlement proceedings. If settlement proceedings have reached an impasse, the parties’ status report shall propose a plan for proceeding on the remaining claims in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Patricia E. Campbell-Smith PATRICIA E. CAMPBELL-SMITH Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?