SERAPHIM TRANSPORT CO. v. USA
Filing
131
ORDER Striking 129 Third MOTION to Compel Discovery, as it does not comply with RCFC appendix E, 9(b) electronic filing requirements. Plaintiff shall refile the third motion to compel discovery, combining the contents of each Adobe PDF file so as to minimize the total number of attachments filed by 9/7/2011. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
<![CDATA[
In The United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 7-359C
(Filed: September 6, 2011)
__________
SERAPHIM TRANSPORT CO.,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
__________
ORDER
__________
Today, plaintiff filed a third motion to compel discovery filed electronically, to which
were attached 19 separate Adobe PDF files. The motion is hereby stricken, as it does not
comply with RCFC appendix E, ΒΆ 9(b) electronic filing requirements. On or before September 7,
2011, plaintiff shall refile the third motion to compel discovery, combining the contents of each
Adobe PDF file so as to minimize the total number of attachments filed (while keeping within
the 5 megabyte maximum file size requirement).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Francis M. Allegra
Francis M. Allegra
Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
