SERAPHIM TRANSPORT CO. v. USA

Filing 60

DISCOVERY SCHEDULING ORDER: motion to compel is hereby stayed until further order. Joint Status Report due by 8/2/2010. Discovery completed by 12/7/2010. Joint Status Report due by 12/21/2010. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Modified on 6/3/2010 (jt1).

Download PDF
SERAPHIM TRANSPORT CO. v. USA Doc. 60 In The United States Court of Federal Claims No. 07-359C (Filed: June 3, 2010) __________ SERAPHIM TRANSPORT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. _________ ORDER __________ On June 2, 2010, a telephonic status conference was held in this case. Participating in the conference were Michael Trevelline, for plaintiff, and Robert Bigler, for defendant. Based on discussions during the conference, it was agreed that: 1. Defendant shall produce documents in the categories previously requested as to all United States Army Camp Arifjan contracts for bottled water, and calls thereunder, for which Major Cockerham and/or Major Momon was the contracting officer; Defendant shall produce documents in the categories previously requested as to all Camp Arifjan contracts for bottled water, and calls thereunder, entered into between the United States Army and the "co-conspirator contractors" referenced in the Momon and Cockerham plea agreement documents; Any privilege issues as to the aforementioned documents shall be resolved under the parties' existing clawback agreement and RCFC 26(b)(5)(B); On or before August 2, 2010, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating how discovery is progressing; On or before December 7, 2010, discovery shall be completed; 2. 3. 4. 5. Dockets.Justia.com 6. On or before December 21, 2010, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating how this case should proceed; and Briefing on plaintiff's motion to compel is stayed until further order. 7. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?