DOBYNS v. USA

Filing 69

ORDER denying 68 plaintiff's request for a status conference. To the extent that plaintiff's request is understood as a motion for leave to take six additional depositions pursuant to RCFC 30(a)(2)(A)(i), that motion is hereby granted. Defendant shall provide plaintiff the last know contact information for Charles Higman or file a response with the court explaining why defendant cannot provide this information by 8/5/2011. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.

Download PDF
In The United States Court of Federal Claims No. 08-700C (Filed: July 27, 2011) __________ JAY ANTHONY DOBYNS, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. _________ ORDER _________ On July 26, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for a status conference. After careful review of plaintiff’s filing: 1. Plaintiff’s request for a status conference is hereby DENIED; 2. To the extent that plaintiff’s request is understood as a motion for leave to take six additional depositions pursuant to RCFC 30(a)(2)(A)(i), that motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff must take all depositions within the fact discovery period set forth in the court’s March 7, 2011, scheduling order; 3. Plaintiff, in its request for a status conference, seeks discovery of documents identified in defendant’s privilege log. If plaintiff’s intent is to compel discovery of these documents, plaintiff must file a separate motion to compel that fully complies with the requirements of RCFC 37 (including the good faith consultation requirements therein); and 4. On or before August 5, 2011, defendant shall: a. Provide to plaintiff the last known contact information for Charles Higman; or b. File a response with the court explaining why defendant cannot or will not provide this information. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?