GOOGLE, INC. et al v. USA

Filing 14

ORDER granting 10 Motion To Issue Scheduling Order. Administrative Record due 11/5/10; Government's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction due 11/12/10; Plaintiff's Reply To Government's Opposition due 11/19/10; Plaintiff's Motion For Judgment Upon The Administrative Record due 12/3/10; Government's Cross-Motion for Judgment Upon The Administrative Record and Response due 12/17/10; Plaintiff's Response and Reply due 12/31/10; Government's Reply due 1/11/11. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (np1)

Download PDF
No. 10-743C Filed: November 5, 2010 ******************************************* * * GOOGLE, INC., et al, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * * * ******************************************* In the United States Court of Federal Claims * SCHEDULING ORDER The Government's November 5, 2010 Consent Motion To Issue Scheduling Order is granted. Because the Government has represented that it will voluntarily stay proceeding in any manner with, or awarding a contract, pursuant to Request For Quotation No. 503786, or any related procurement, solicitation, task order, or activity to implement the Microsoft Business Productivity Online Suite-Federal Messaging solution until January 25, 2011, the following briefing schedule will apply in this case: November 5, 2010: November 12, 2010: November 19, 2010: December 3, 2010: December 17, 2010: December 31, 2010: January 11, 2011: Filing of the administrative record; Government files opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction; Plaintiffs file reply to Government Opposition; Plaintiffs file motion for judgment upon the administrative record; Government files cross-motion for judgment upon the administrative record and response; Plaintiffs file response and reply; Government files reply. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Susan G. Braden SUSAN G. BRADEN Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?