GOOGLE, INC. et al v. USA

Filing 29

NOTICE, filed by USA Of Filing Corrected Administrative Record (Krafchek, Christopher)

Download PDF
GOOGLE, INC. et al v. USA Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST ******************************************* * GOOGLE, INC., et al, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION * * Intervenor-Defendant * * ******************************************* No. 10-743C Judge Braden DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING THE CORRECTED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Pursuant to Appendix C, ¶ 21, of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims , defendant respectfully provides this notice that we are filing a continuous Bates-stamped copy of the corrected administrative record with the Court on CD-ROM, under seal, and providing one bound paper copy of Tab 31A, and 33-46 tabs to chambers. Respectfully submitted, TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL F. HERTZ Deputy Assistant Attorney General s/ Kirk T. Manhardt KIRK T. MANHARDT Assistant Director Dockets.Justia.com OF COUNSEL CHARLES M. KERSTEN Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice SHERYL RAKESTRAW Attorney Advisor Department of the Interior November 23, 2010 s/ Christopher L. Krafchek CHRISTOPHER L. KRAFCHEK Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: (202) 305-0041 Fax: (202) 305-7644 Attorneys for Defendant 2 CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of November, 2010, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING THE CORRECTED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. /s/ Christopher L. Krafchek

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?