GOOGLE, INC. et al v. USA

Filing 31

Joint MOTION to Amend Schedule, filed by GOOGLE, INC., ONIX NETWORKING CORPORATION, SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION, USA.Response due by 12/17/2010.(Krafchek, Christopher)

GOOGLE, INC. et al v. USA

Doc. 31

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST ******************************************* * GOOGLE, INC., et al, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant, * * and * * SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION * * Intervenor-Defendant. * * *******************************************

No. 10-743C

Judge Braden

JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Pursuant to Rules 6(b) and 6.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, plaintiffs, Google, Inc. and Onix Networking Corporation, and defendant-intervenor, Softchoice Corporation (collectively "the parties"), respectfully request that the Court modify the current briefing schedule to account for recent events in this case. Specifically, Softchoice intervened in the case on November 15, 2010 and subsequently moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. The proposed modifications below are intended to account for these events. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court modify the schedule as follows: DATE November 5, 2010: EVENT Government files the administrative record.

Dockets.Justia.com

November 19, 2010:

Government files opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs file consolidated brief to opposition briefs filed by Government and Softchoice, its motion for judgment upon the administrative record, and response to Softchoice's motion to dismiss. Government and Softchoice file cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record and response to plaintiffs' motion for judgment upon the administrative record. Softchoice files its reply in support of its motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs file response and reply to cross-motions of Government and Softchoice. Government and Softchoice file reply to plaintiffs' response.

December 3, 2010:

December 17, 2010:

December 31 , 2010:

January 11, 2010:

For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request that the briefing schedule be modified as outlined above. Respectfully submitted, TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL F. HERTZ Deputy Assistant Attorney General s/ Kirk T. Manhardt KIRK T. MANHARDT Assistant Director

2

OF COUNSEL CHARLES M. KERSTEN Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice SHERYL RAKESTRAW Attorney Advisor Department of the Interior November 30, 2010

s/ Christopher L. Krafchek CHRISTOPHER L. KRAFCHEK Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant

3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on this 30th day of November, 2010, a copy of the foregoing "JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULING" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. s/Christopher L. Krafchek