GOOGLE, INC. et al v. USA

Filing 32

ORDER granting 31 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's Reply To Government Opposition, Motion For Judgment Upon The Administrative Record, and Reply to Softchoice's Motion To Dismiss due 12/3/2010; Government's and Softchoice's Cross-Motions For Judgment Upon The Administrative Record and Responses, and Softchoice's Reply in Support of its Motion To Dismiss due 12/17/10; Plaintiffs' Response and Reply due 12/31/10; Government's and Softchoice's Reply due 1/11/11. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (np1)

Download PDF
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-743C Filed: November 30, 2010 ******************************************* * * GOOGLE, INC., et al, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant, * * and * * SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION, * * Defendant-Intervenor. * * ******************************************* SCHEDULING ORDER The parties' November 30, 2010 Joint Motion To Modify The Briefing Schedule is granted. The following briefing schedule will apply in this case: November 5, 2010: November 19, 2010: December 3, 2010: Government files the administrative record. Government files opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs file consolidated brief to opposition briefs filed by Government and Softchoice, its motion for judgment upon the administrative record, and response to Softchoice's motion to dismiss. Government and Softchoice file cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record and response to Plaintiffs' motion for judgment upon the administrative record. Softchoice files its reply in support of its motion to dismiss. * December 17, 2010: December 31, 2010: January 11, 2011: Plaintiffs file response and reply to cross-motions of Government and Softchoice. Government and Softchoice file reply to Plaintiffs' response. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Susan G. Braden SUSAN G. BRADEN Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?