GOOGLE, INC. et al v. USA

Filing 70

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Softchoice's Motion to Terminate the Stay of Proceedings, Dissolve the Courts Preliminary Injunction, and Dismiss the Action, filed by SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION.Response due by 5/2/2011.(Rosenbaum, Steven)

Electronically Filed on April 14, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Bid Protest
____________________________________
GOOGLE, INC,
)
)
and
)
)
ONIX NETWORKING CORPORATION, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Defendant,
)
)
SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION,
)
)
Defendant-Intervenor.
)
)

Case No. 10-743C
Judge Susan G. Braden

SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENLARGE
Pursuant to Rules 6(b) and 6.1 of the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims,
Defendant-Intervenor Softchoice Corporation (“Softchoice”) respectfully requests a five-day
enlargement of time, through and including April 22, 2011, within which to file its reply to
Plaintiffs’ Response to Softchoice’s Motion to Terminate the Stay of Proceedings, Dissolve the
Court’s Preliminary Injunction, and Dismiss the Action (“Plaintiffs’ Opposition”). Currently,
Softchoice’s reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition is due on April 18, 2011.1 This is Softchoice’s first
request for an enlargement of time in this case, and counsel for Plaintiffs and the Government do

1

The Government’s reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition also is due on April 18, 2011. On April
13, 2011, the Government filed an unopposed motion to extend the deadline for it to file a reply
to the Plaintiffs’ Opposition to April 22, 2011. The Government’s motion incorrectly states that
its reply is currently due on April 15, 2011.

DC: 3950833-1

not oppose this request. This enlargement is requested to provide Softchoice with sufficient time
to respond to Plaintiffs’ Opposition, which raises several legal arguments. In addition, this
enlargement is requested to preserve the current briefing arrangement, with the Government and
Softchoice filing replies to Plaintiffs’ Opposition on the same day.
WHEREFORE, Softchoice respectfully requests a five-day enlargement of time, through
and including April 22, 2011, within which to file our reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition.
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Steven J. Rosenbaum
Steven J. Rosenbaum
Counsel of Record
Alan A. Pemberton
Sarah L. Wilson
Scott A. Freling
Shelli L. Calland
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
William A. Shook
SHOOK DORAN KOEHL LLP
643 E Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
April 14, 2011

Counsel for Softchoice Corporation

-2-