HALLMARK-PHOENIX 3, LLC v. USA

Filing 29

ORDER re: 27 plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiff shall file a statement with the court explaining whether that is still its understanding or whether, instead, its filing of a motion for preliminary injunction reflects either changed circumstances or, at least, a change in its position regarding how this case should proceed. Notice of Compliance due by 4/18/2011. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.

Download PDF
In The United States Court of Federal Claims No. 11-98C (Filed: April 15, 2011) __________ HALLMARK-PHOENIX 3, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. __________ ORDER __________ On April 14, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction. Based on its prior discussions with the parties, the court’s understanding is that the parties agreed that the jurisdictional issues in this case would be resolved before the court would consider any motions seeking equitable relief. On or before, April 18, 2011, plaintiff shall file a statement with the court explaining whether that is still its understanding or whether, instead, its filing of a motion for preliminary injunction reflects either changed circumstances or, at least, a change in its position regarding how this case should proceed. Following the receipt of this statement, the court will issue an order setting a briefing schedule for plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?