HALLMARK-PHOENIX 3, LLC v. USA
Filing
29
ORDER re: 27 plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiff shall file a statement with the court explaining whether that is still its understanding or whether, instead, its filing of a motion for preliminary injunction reflects either changed circumstances or, at least, a change in its position regarding how this case should proceed. Notice of Compliance due by 4/18/2011. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
In The United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 11-98C
(Filed: April 15, 2011)
__________
HALLMARK-PHOENIX 3, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
__________
ORDER
__________
On April 14, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction. Based on its prior
discussions with the parties, the court’s understanding is that the parties agreed that the
jurisdictional issues in this case would be resolved before the court would consider any motions
seeking equitable relief. On or before, April 18, 2011, plaintiff shall file a statement with the
court explaining whether that is still its understanding or whether, instead, its filing of a motion
for preliminary injunction reflects either changed circumstances or, at least, a change in its
position regarding how this case should proceed. Following the receipt of this statement, the
court will issue an order setting a briefing schedule for plaintiff’s motion for preliminary
injunction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Francis M. Allegra
Francis M. Allegra
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?