SINGH v. USA
Filing
47
Order of Dismissal The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Bohdan A. Futey. (rp) Copy to parties.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 13-195T
Filed: May 18, 2017
KARAMVIR SINGH,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
John E. Cicero, II, Bellevue, WA, for plaintiff.
Jason S. Selmont, U.S. Department of Justice – Tax Division, Washington, DC, for
defendant.
ORDER
On May 18, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for entry of judgment pursuant to
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims as follows:
1. The parties stipulate and agree to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff’s
refund claims and defendant’s counterclaim relating to the two quarterly tax
periods ended December 31, 2008, and March 31, 2009.
2. The parties stipulate and agree that judgment in the amount of $21,324.36
should be entered in favor of defendant, and against plaintiff, on defendant’s
counterclaim relating to the quarterly tax period ended June 30, 2009, plus all
statutory interest accruing thereon from the date(s) of assessment, pursuant to
I.R.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c), until paid.
3. The parties stipulate and agree that judgment in the amount of $116,765.22 and
$128,837.07 should be entered in favor of defendant, and against plaintiff, on
defendant’s counterclaim relating to the two quarterly tax periods ended
September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2009, respectively, plus all statutory
interest accruing thereon from the date(s) of assessment, pursuant to I.R.C. §§
6601, 6621, and 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c), until paid.
The stipulations are affirmed and approved. The Clerk is directed to enter
judgment accordingly. Each party shall bear its own costs, attorney’s fees, and other
expenses of litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Bohdan A. Futey
BOHDAN A. FUTEY
Senior Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?