INGRAM et al v. USA
Filing
1
Order of Dismissal. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Marian Blank Horn. (jm5) Copy to parties.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
THOMAS A. INGRAM AND AMANDA
HINDS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
No. 14-4249L
Filed: May 3, 2016
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
ORDER
On April 26, 2016, the court granted in part defendant’s cross-motion for partial
summary judgment in the case of Richard K. Phipps, et al. v. United States, Case No. 14424L. As a result of the court’s decision, certain plaintiffs’ claims in the case of Richard
K. Phipps, et al. v. United States, Case No. 14-424L have been dismissed, including the
above-captioned plaintiffs. The claims associated with parcel identification number
420420107000000, of the above-captioned plaintiffs, are, hereby, SEVERED from the
case of Richard K. Phipps, et al. v. United States, Case No. 14-424L, and shall be
reorganized, for case management purposes, into the above-captioned case, Thomas A.
Ingram and Amanda Hinds v. United States, and assigned Case No. 14-4249L. The court
DISMISSES, with prejudice, the claims of Thomas A. Ingram and Amanda Hinds
associated with parcel identification number 420420107000000. As there is no just
reason for delay, the Clerk’s Office shall enter immediate JUDGMENT consistent with
this Order, pursuant to RCFC 54(b). As the Order disposes of all properties of the named
plaintiffs, Case No. 14-4249L shall be CLOSED. Neither the dismissal of the claims of the
plaintiffs herein nor the entry of judgment by the Clerk’s Office shall affect this court’s
jurisdiction over the remaining plaintiffs and properties in the case of Richard K. Phipps,
et al. v. United States, Case No. 14-424L
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Marian Blank Horn
MARIAN BLANK HORN
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?