ABBOTT et al v. USA
Filing
131
SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiffs' Reply In Support Of Their Motion For Partial Summary Judgment And Response To The Governments Cross-Motion For Partial Summary Judgment due by 3/18/2021. The Government's Reply In Support Of Its Cross-Motion For Partial Summary Judgment due by 4/15/2021. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. (jw) Service on parties made.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
DANNY L. ABBOTT, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 15-211L
Filed February 19, 2021
SCHEDULING ORDER
On February 12, 2021, the government filed an unopposed motion for leave to file certain
exhibits in support of its response and opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary
judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment. ECF No. 129. In the motion,
government counsel represents that these exhibits were not originally filed with the
government’s cross-motion due to technical difficulties. Government counsel also represents
that plaintiffs do not oppose this motion, but that plaintiffs request that the remaining deadlines
in the Court’s January 13, 2021, Scheduling Order be extended by one week to account for the
delay in their receipt of all of the government’s exhibits.
In light of the foregoing, and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the
government’s motion for leave to file certain exhibits in support of its response and opposition to
plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment.
The Court, with the assistance of the parties, modifies the Scheduling Order dated January 13,
2021, as follows:
Plaintiffs shall FILE a reply in support of
their motion for partial summary judgment
and a response to the government’s crossmotion for partial summary judgment.
March 18, 2021
The government shall FILE a reply in support
of its cross-motion for partial summary
judgment.
April 15, 2021
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Lydia Kay Griggsby
LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY
Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?