PIPES v. USA

Filing 108

ORDER OF JUDGMENT. For the reasons provided in the Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently with this Order, the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record 61 , as supplemented 100 , is DENIED, and the defendant's motion for judgment on the administrative record 64 , as supplemented 104 , is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. No costs are awarded. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made.

Download PDF
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1163C Filed: January 7, 2022 MALCOLM PIPES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. ORDER For the reasons provided in the Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently with this Order, the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the administrative record (ECF 61), as supplemented (ECF 100), is DENIED, and the defendant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record (ECF 64), as supplemented (ECF 104), is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. No costs are awarded. It is so ORDERED. s/ Richard A. Hertling Richard A. Hertling Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?