PIPES v. USA
Filing
17
Docketed for Administrative Purposes UNREPORTED ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (ej) Copy to parties.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 15-1163
Filed: August 30, 2016
****************************************
*
MALCOLM PIPES,
*
*
Plaintiff,
*
*
v.
*
*
*
THE UNITED STATES,
*
Defendant.
*
*
****************************************
ORDER
Having reviewed the documents concerning the Government’s January 27, 2016 Motion
To Dismiss, the court has determined that it is not in a position to dismiss the October 9, 2015
Complaint, because there are a number of jurisdictional facts at issue.1 Specifically, the court
requests that the Government produce the following:
1. The United States Air Force (“USAF”) letter formally enrolling Plaintiff into the
Self-Paced Fitness Program (“SFIP”);
2. The USAF Fitness Screening Questionnaire completed by Plaintiff on or about
January 6, 2006;
3. The February 5, 2006 USAF Medical Clearance Exam Report from the 917th
Medical Squadron;
4. The USAF Adverse Event Report concerning Plaintiff’s September 3, 2006
stroke;
5. All documents concerning the USAF’s determination that Plaintiff’s stroke did
not occur in the line of duty, i.e., during inactive duty training, and, if applicable,
affidavits from those USAF personnel who relayed the USAF’s determination to
Plaintiff on December 5, 2006 and February 4, 2007; and
1
Therefore, the Government’s January 27, 2016 Motion To Dismiss is denied.
6. A copy of or internet link to all relevant Air Force Instructions (“AFI”) not
already submitted to the court, including:
AFI 36-3209
AFI 41-210
The Government will submit these documents to the court on or before October 14, 2016.
Upon receipt of the requested documents, the court will schedule a status conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Susan G. Braden
SUSAN G. BRADEN
Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?