PIPES v. USA

Filing 17

Docketed for Administrative Purposes UNREPORTED ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (ej) Copy to parties.

Download PDF
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1163 Filed: August 30, 2016 **************************************** * MALCOLM PIPES, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * * THE UNITED STATES, * Defendant. * * **************************************** ORDER Having reviewed the documents concerning the Government’s January 27, 2016 Motion To Dismiss, the court has determined that it is not in a position to dismiss the October 9, 2015 Complaint, because there are a number of jurisdictional facts at issue.1 Specifically, the court requests that the Government produce the following: 1. The United States Air Force (“USAF”) letter formally enrolling Plaintiff into the Self-Paced Fitness Program (“SFIP”); 2. The USAF Fitness Screening Questionnaire completed by Plaintiff on or about January 6, 2006; 3. The February 5, 2006 USAF Medical Clearance Exam Report from the 917th Medical Squadron; 4. The USAF Adverse Event Report concerning Plaintiff’s September 3, 2006 stroke; 5. All documents concerning the USAF’s determination that Plaintiff’s stroke did not occur in the line of duty, i.e., during inactive duty training, and, if applicable, affidavits from those USAF personnel who relayed the USAF’s determination to Plaintiff on December 5, 2006 and February 4, 2007; and 1 Therefore, the Government’s January 27, 2016 Motion To Dismiss is denied. 6. A copy of or internet link to all relevant Air Force Instructions (“AFI”) not already submitted to the court, including:  AFI 36-3209  AFI 41-210 The Government will submit these documents to the court on or before October 14, 2016. Upon receipt of the requested documents, the court will schedule a status conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Susan G. Braden SUSAN G. BRADEN Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?