PRESCIENT, INC. v. USA
Filing
10
UNREPORTED ORDER: Because the statute specifies that the parties cannot waive disqualification under circumstances, discussed during today's conference call, I must recuse myself. See 28 U.S.C. 455(e). The clerk of court is directed to reassign this case. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae) Copy to parties.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 16-109 C
(Filed January 27, 2016)
Not for Publication
PRESCIENT, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant,
)
)
)
)
)
)
Disqualification
ORDER
The instant bid protest was filed on January 21, 2016. See Doc. 1. On January
27, 2016, Matt Martin Real Estate Management, LLC, filed a motion to intervene.
See Doc. 5. It has come to the court’s attention that the intervenor is represented by
attorneys with the firm Venable, LLC. As such, I must disqualify myself as the
presiding judge, and the case will be reassigned to another judge on the court.
The statute governing judicial disqualification provides, in relevant part, that
a judge “shall” disqualify himself if “[h]e or his spouse, or a person within the third
degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person . . . [i]s known
by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome
of the proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(5)(iii). A “person within the third degree of
relationship” to me is a partner at Venable. As a partner with the firm, he has an
interest that “could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.” See,
e.g., Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1113 (5th Cir. 1980).
Because the statute specifies that the parties cannot waive disqualification
under these circumstances, I must recuse myself. See 28 U.S.C. 455(e). The clerk
of court is directed to reassign this case.
SO ORDERED.
s/ James F. Merow
James F. Merow,
Senior Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?