FREEMAN v. USA

Filing 3

Order waiving the filing fee and directing the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to file no further complaints from plaintiff until he has paid the requisite filing fee. Signed by Senior Judge Robert J. Yock. (dls) Copy to parties.

r}$?fr. [$$At
@nftr[ $tstts

@ourt of felers[ @lsfms

Nos. l6-723 C,16-724C
and 16-734 C
Iune 27 ,2016

NEAPOLEON JWAN FREEMAN, SR.,

FILED
JUN Z

i

2016

U.S. COURT OF
FEDERAL CLAIMS

Plaintiff,

THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant.

ORDER WAIVING FILING FEES AND DISMISSING CASES
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
These complaints are the latest in a series of complaints the plaintiff has
bombarded this court with in the last few years. He has been summarily dismissed for
lack ofjurisdiction by every judge and court that has handled his complaints. See e.g.,
Freeman v. United,Slales, No. 15-1389 (Fed. Cl. Dec. 15, 2015); Freeman v. (Jnited
Srares, No. 13-327-C (Fed. Cl. Sept. 19, 2013); Freeman v. United States, 568 F. App'x
892, 893 (Fed. Cir. 2014), reh'g denied (Sept. 22,2014). All of these cases have been
characterized by plaintiff s almost total incoherence and rantings.
To the extent it can be deciphered, the complaints seem to be filled with concerns
general prison
mayhem (also no jurisdiction). Although the plaintiff has filed pro se, which would
normally allow him some leeway, plaintiff still must give the court some hint of what his
complaints are about, so that the court has a fighting chance to determine if it does have
any jurisdiction. Demes v. United States,52 Fed. Cl. 365, 368 (2002) (citing Kelly v.
Sec'y, U.S. Dept. ofLabor, Sl2 F. 2d 1378, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1987)).

of tortious wrongs (no jurisdiction); kidnapping (no jurisdiction); or

Since the plaintiffs complaints have not accomplished this essential factual
predicate, these complaints will also have to be summarily dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction.
Since the plaintiff is currently residing in Virginia's Sussex State Prison in
Waverly, VA, plaintiff s filing fees, in all three cases, will be waived by the court. The
Clerk will thereafter dismiss plaintiff s complaints in their entirety, and enter judgment
for the defendant in each.

No costs.

If

the plaintiff continues in the future to file these frivolous lawsuits, such costs and
fees will be imposed. In the future, the Clerk is directed NOT to file any more
complaints from the plaintiffuntil after he has paid the requisite filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERDD.

-)

-