STATE OF TEXAS et al v. USA

Filing 29

UNREPORTED ORDER dismissing the protest, without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Marian Blank Horn. (es) Copy to parties.

Download PDF
In the United States Court of Federal Claims * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** THE STATE OF TEXAS, by and through The Texas Workforce Commission, Business Enterprises of Texas; and ROLAND MARSHALL, a licensed blind vendor, Protestors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, v. FOOD SERVICES, INC. OF GAINESVILLE Defendant-Intervenor. * * * * * * * * * No. 17-266C * Filed: March 7, 2017 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ORDER On March 7, 2017, another bid protest hearing was held in the above captioned protest. Since the initial bid protest hearing occurred, the government has issued a stop work order regarding the contract issued to the intervenor, Food Services, Inc. of Gainesville. In addition, the Department of Education Arbitration Panel issued a decision in The State of Texas, by and through the Texas Workforce Commission, Business Enterprises of Texas and the United States Of America, by and through the United States Department of the Air Force on February 28, 2017, which decided that the Air Force had improperly excluded Protestor State of Texas from consideration, in violation of the Randolph Shephard Act. See 20 U.S.C. § 107, et seq. (2012). Although given earlier indications at the initial bid protest hearing by an agency representative that the Air Force would “generally” not comply with the dictates of the arbitration decision, comments which were subsequently disavowed by other government representatives, at the hearing today, the government indicated that a new selection process would be undertaken and that Protestor State of Texas would be included in the competitive range and that the new process would be undertaken with proper deference to the Department of Education arbitration decision and the dictates of the relevant statutes, regulations, Air Force Directives, and Air Force Instructions. It is, therefore, appropriate at this time, as fully explored with the parties at the hearing today, to enter a permanent injunction, instructing the government not to proceed with the award on February 14, 2017 to the intervenor in the above captioned case. Therefore, the above captioned protest is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In the event the protestors should feel the need to file a new protest with regard to Solicitation No. FA3016-15-R-0003 for mission essential full food service to be performed at “JBSA, FSH, and Camp Bullis,” the clerk's office is directed to waive the filing fee. The clerk’s office is directed to enter JUDGMENT consistent with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Marian Blank Horn MARIAN BLANK HORN Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?