IN RE ADDICKS AND BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD-CONTROL RESERVOIRS V. USA
Filing
103
UNREPORTED MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 2 (ORDER ESTABLISHING SUB-MASTER DOCKET FOR UPSTREAM CLAIMS). Signed by Chief Judge Susan G. Braden. (cn) Copy to parties. (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/5/2017: # 1 Attachment A) (ar).
COURT ATTACHMENT A
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed: November 20, 2017
IN RE ADDICKS AND BARKER
(TEXAS) FLOOD-CONTROL
RESERVOIRS
Master Docket No. 17-3000L
THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
ALL CASES
ORDER REGARDING JUDICIAL ASSIGNMENT, APPOINTMENT OF PLAINTIFFS’
COUNSEL FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRE-TRIAL JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY,
THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE OF THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS 12(b)(1)–(7), AND SCHEDULING.
(UPSTREAM CLAIMS)
During the October 6, 2017 and November 1, 2017 hearings convened in Houston, the
court was advised that putative class action complaints and individual complaints with upstream
claims affecting approximately 10,000 to 16,000 private property interests are or will be filed in
the United States Court of Federal Claims. See, e.g., In re Addicks and Barker (Texas) FloodControl Reservoirs, Master Docket No. 17-3000L, Dkt. 7 (Fed. Cl. Nov. 3, 2017).
I.
Assignment Of A United States Court Of Federal Claims Judge.
The Honorable Charles F. Lettow of the United States Court of Federal Claims is hereby
assigned to manage jurisdictional discovery and adjudicate issues presented by any motion filed,
pursuant to Rule of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1)–(7).1
II.
Appointment Of Co-Counsel For Jurisdictional Discovery (In Alphabetical
Order).
On October 11, 2017, the court issued an Order requesting “all counsel of record that wish
to be considered as class counsel(s) and/or lead class counsel(s)” to file a Statement of Interest
addressing the factors set forth in RCFC 23(g)(1). See, e.g., Y And J Properties, Ltd., No. 17-1189,
Dkt. 12 at 6 (Fed. Cl. Oct.11, 2017).
1
On December 4, 2017, the Clerk of Court will effectuate this assignment when Master
Docket, In re Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs, Master Docket No. 17-3000L
is divided into Sub-Master Dockets. See In re Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control
Reservoirs, Master Docket No. 17-3000L, Dkt. 10 (Fed. Cl. Nov. 13, 2017).
After considering the views of all counsel, the court makes the following appointments of
Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the specific purposes set forth herein.
Mr. Ian H. Gershengorn graduated from Harvard Law School where he received a Juris
Doctor, magna cum laude. Mr. Gershengorn was a Law Clerk to Circuit Court Judge Amalya L.
Kearse of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and a Law Clerk to Justice
John Paul Stevens of the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Gershengorn also was Principal
Deputy Solicitor General and Acting Solicitor General of the United States. Mr. Gershengorn is
Chair of Jenner & Block LLP’s Appellate and Supreme Court Practice. Mr. Gershengorn is
admitted to the bar of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court appoints Mr.
Gershengorn as Co-Lead Counsel for the purposes set forth herein.2
Mr. Larry Vincent graduated from the University of Texas School of Law, with honors.
Mr. Vincent served as a Law Clerk for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the United States Supreme
Court. Mr. Vincent is of counsel to Burns and Charest, LLP, where he specializes in complex civil
litigation, class action lawsuits. Mr. Vincent is admitted to the bar of the United States Court of
Federal Claims and the United States Supreme Court. The court appoints Mr. Vincent as Co-Lead
Counsel for the purposes set forth herein.3
Where “diverse interests exist among the parties, the court may designate . . . counsel
representing different interests.” MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION § 10.224 (4th ed. 2004). Mr.
Gershengorn and Mr. Vincent, however, represent a group of law firms that have filed Complaints
they contend should be certified as class actions. The court has determined that the issue of class
certification is premature at this juncture. The court is concerned that the interests of property
owners who ultimately may decide to opt-in to a certified class, may be different from those who
may decide to pursue claims as individuals. See RCFC 23 Rules Committee Notes (Rule 23 “only
contemplates opt-in class certifications”). For this reason, the court also has appointed Mr. Vuk
Vujasinovic to serve as Of Counsel for the purposes set forth herein to ensure the interests of
individual plaintiffs are represented, since Vujansinovic & Beckcom LLP represents only
individual plaintiffs who, at this point, do not seek class certification.
Mr. Vujasinovic graduated from the Houston Law Center where he received a Juris Doctor
and was Editor of the Houston Law Review. Mr. Vujasinovic is a Founding Partner of
Vujansinovic & Beckcom LLP, a Houston law firm specializing in complex civil litigation. Before
co-founding VB Attorneys, Mr. Vujasinovic specialized in complex litigation at Shook, Hardy &
Bacon. Mr. Vujasinovic is admitted to the bar of the United States Court of Federal Claims.
All of the above-referenced appointed counsel satisfy the criteria for selection, set out in
the MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION (4th ed. 2004) and MDL Standards and Best Practices,
DUKE LAW SCHOOL CENTER FOR JUDICIAL STUDIES (Sept. 11, 2014),https://law.duke.edu/sites/
default/files/centers/judicialstudies/MDL_Standards_and_Best_Practices_2014-REVISED.pdf.
2
Mr. Derek Potts of Potts Law Firm recommended Jenner & Block LLP to the court.
Mr. Charles Irvine of Irvine & Conner, PLLC recommended Burns and Charest, LLP to
the court.
2
3
All appointed counsel will be compensated, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c), for their
representation of Plaintiffs, as set forth herein, including any subsequent appeals. See Hensley v.
Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983); see also Hubbard v. United States, 480 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir.
2007). In that regard, appointed counsel are expected to keep and maintain detailed time records
from the date of this Order, take care to limit the use of law firm personnel (partners, associates,
and paralegals) only to the extent absolutely necessary to meet professional standards of due
diligence and care and minimize ancillary expenses.
III.
Schedule.
To ensure the expeditious and orderly management of jurisdictional discovery, the court
establishes the following schedule.
On or before December 8, 2017, the Government will file any Motion For A More Definite
Statement, pursuant to RCFC 12(e).
On or before December 15, 2017, the parties will exchange Mandatory Initial Disclosures,
including lists of documents and tangible items.
On or before December 29, 2017, the parties will exchange electronically stored
information and hard-copy documents.
On or before January 15, 2018, Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint, consolidated or
otherwise, in response to any motion filed on December 8, 2017, pursuant to RCFC 12(e).
On or before February 15, 2018, the Government will file any Motion To Dismiss, pursuant
to RCFC 12(b)(1)–(7).
On or before March 15, 2018, Plaintiffs will file any Response to the Government’s
February 15, 2018 Motion To Dismiss.
On or before April 2, 2018, the Government will file any Reply to the March 15, 2018
Plaintiffs’ Response.
On or before July 14, 2018, the court will convene an oral argument in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 515 Rusk Street, Houston, Texas on the
Government’s February 15, 2018 Motion To Dismiss.
Page limitations for briefs and court filings, set forth in RCFC, are suspended. No
extensions of time will be granted, but for extraordinary circumstances.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Susan G. Braden
SUSAN G. BRADEN
Chief Judge
3
COURT ATTACHMENT B
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed: November 20, 2017
IN RE ADDICKS AND BARKER
(TEXAS) FLOOD-CONTROL
RESERVOIRS
Master Docket No. 17-3000L
THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
ALL CASES
ORDER REGARDING JUDICIAL ASSIGNMENT, APPOINTMENT OF PLAINTIFFS’
COUNSEL FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL OR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR CROSS-MOTIONS
PURSUANT TO RULE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS 56
AND/OR A TRIAL ON LIABILITY, AND SCHEDULING.
(UPSTREAM CLAIMS)
During the October 6, 2017 and November 1, 2017 hearings convened in Houston, the
court was advised that putative class action complaints and individual complaints with upstream
claims affecting approximately 4,000 private property interests are or will be filed in the United
States Court of Federal Claims. See, e.g., In re Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control
Reservoirs, Master Docket No. 17-3000L, Dkt. 7 (Fed. Cl. Nov. 3, 2017).
I.
Assignment Of A United States Court Of Federal Claims Judge.
The Honorable Eric G. Bruggink of the United States Court of Federal Claims is hereby
assigned to manage pre-trial discovery and adjudicate all pre-trial dispositive motions.1
II.
Appointment Of Co-Counsel For Pre-Trial Discovery And Dispositive Motions
(In Alphabetical Order).
On October 11, 2017, the court issued an Order requesting “all counsel of record that wish
to be considered as class counsel(s) and/or lead class counsel(s)” to file a Statement of Interest
1
On December 4, 2017, the Clerk of Court will effectuate this assignment when Master
Docket, In re Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs, Master Docket No. 17-3000L
is divided into Sub-Master Dockets. See In re Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control
Reservoirs, Master Docket No. 17-3000L, Dkt. 10 (Fed. Cl. Nov. 13, 2017).
addressing the factors set forth in Rule of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”)
23(g)(1). See, e.g., Y And J Properties, Ltd., No. 17-1189, Dkt. 12 at 6 (Fed. Cl. Oct.11, 2017).
After considering the views of all counsel, the court makes the following appointments of
Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the specific purposes set forth herein.
Mr. Daniel Charest graduated from Tulane University Law School, summa cum laude, and
served as a Law Clerk for Judge Edith Brown Clement of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Fifth Circuit. Mr. Charest is a Founding Partner of the Dallas-based firm, Burns and Charest,
LLP, where he specializes in complex civil litigation. Mr. Charest is a member of the bar of the
United States Court of Federal Claims. The court appoints Mr. Charest as Co-Lead Counsel for
the purposes set forth herein.2
Mr. Charles Irvine graduated from the University of Houston Law Center and has a Masters
of Science in Conservation from the University College London. Mr. Irvine is a Founding Partner
in the Houston law firm of Irvine & Conner, PLLC, where he specializes in state and federal court
litigation concerning environmental law. In addition, Mr. Irvine has been an Adjunct Professor at
the University of Houston Law Center, where he has taught environmental law. Mr. Irvine is
admitted to the bar of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court appoints Mr. Irvine as
Co-Lead Counsel for the purposes set forth herein.
Mr. Larry Vincent graduated from the University of Texas School of Law, with honors.
Mr. Vincent served as a Law Clerk for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the United States Supreme
Court. Mr. Vincent is of counsel to Burns and Charest, LLP, where he specializes in complex civil
litigation, class action lawsuits. Mr. Vincent is admitted to the bar of the United States Court of
Federal Claims and the United States Supreme Court. The court appoints Mr. Vincent as Co-Lead
Counsel for the purposes set forth herein.3
Where “diverse interests exist among the parties, the court may designate . . . counsel
representing different interests.” MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION § 10.224 (4th ed. 2004). Mr.
Irvine has filed a complaint that he contends should be certified as a class action. The court has
determined that the issue of class certification is premature at this juncture. The court is concerned
that the interests of property owners who ultimately may decide to opt-in to a certified class, may
be different from those who may decide to pursue claims as individuals. See RCFC 23 Rules
Committee Notes (Rule 23 “only contemplates opt-in class certifications”). For this reason, the
court also has appointed Mr. E. Armistead Easterby to serve as Co-Lead Counsel for the purposes
set forth herein to ensure the interests of individual plaintiffs are represented, since Williams
Kherkher LLP represent only individual plaintiffs who, at this point, do not seek class treatment.
Mr. Easterby graduated from the Houston Law Center, cum laude, and is a Partner in the
Houston law firm of Williams Kherkher LLP, where he specializes in complex civil litigation. Mr.
2
Mr. Charles Irvine of Irvine & Conner, PLLC recommended Burns and Charest, LLP to
the court.
3
Mr. Charles Irvine of Irvine & Conner, PLLC recommended Burns and Charest, LLP to
the court.
2
Easterby is admitted to the bar of the United States Court of Federal Claims, the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court.
Each of the above-referenced appointed counsel satisfy the criteria for selection, set out in
the MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION (4th ed. 2004) and MDL Standards and Best Practices,
DUKE LAW SCHOOL CENTER FOR JUDICIAL STUDIES (Sept. 11, 2014), https://law.duke.edu/sites/
default/files/centers/judicialstudies/MDL_Standards_and_Best_Practices_2014-REVISED.pdf.
All appointed counsel will be compensated, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c), for work on
pre-trial discovery issues and dispositive motions, including any subsequent appeals. See
Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983); see also Hubbard v. United States, 480 F.3d 1327
(Fed. Cir. 2007). In that regard, appointed counsel are expected to keep and maintain detailed time
records from the date of this Order, take care to limit the use of law firm personnel (partners,
associates, and paralegals), only to the extent absolutely necessary to meet professional standards
of due diligence and care and minimize ancillary expenses.
III.
Schedule.
To ensure the expeditious and orderly management of pre-trial jurisdictional discovery,
dispositive motions, and/or a trial on liability, the court establishes the following schedule.
On or before January 30, 2018, all initial disclosures and electronically stored information
and hard copy documents filed in the pre-trial phase of this case, will be provided to opposing
counsel.
On or before February 28, 2018, the Government will file an Answer, pursuant to RCFC
7(a)(2), in response to any Amended Complaint filed on or before January 15, 2018. Thereafter,
the parties may conduct discovery, subject to court Order, including any expert discovery, to
conclude no later than May 31, 2018.
On or before June 15, 2018, the parties will file any dispositive motion(s), pursuant to
RCFC 56.
On or before July 16, 2018, the parties may file any Responses and/or Cross-Motions to
the June 15, 2018 dispositive motion(s).
On or before July 31, 2018, the parties simultaneously may file any Replies.
On or before October 29, 2018, the court will convene an oral argument in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 515 Rusk Street, Houston, Texas on any
dispositive motions.
If contested facts preclude disposition of this case on partial or summary judgment,
pursuant to RCFC 56, this case will be set for a trial on liability by the assigned judge, at the
earliest date available.
3
Page limitations for briefs and court filings, set forth in RCFC, are suspended. No
extensions of time will be granted, but for extraordinary circumstances.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Susan G. Braden
SUSAN G. BRADEN
Chief Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?