LAND SHARK SHREDDING, LLC v. USA

Filing 25

granting 18 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6); Order of Dismissal.; UNREPORTED Order The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Victor J. Wolski. (ws) Service on parties made.

Download PDF
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-482C (Filed May 21, 2018) NOT FOR PUBLICATION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LAND SHARK SHREDDING, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant, * * and * * TRUSS CRANE, INC., d/b/a ALL * PURPOSE DOCUMENT * DESTRUCTION, * * Defendant–Intervenor. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER For the reasons stated on the record at the conclusion of this afternoon’s oral argument, defendant’s motion to dismiss this case is GRANTED. Plaintiff, whose offer was the highest of four submitted in this lowest price technically acceptable procurement, cannot establish a substantial chance of receiving the award based solely on errors concerning the evaluation of the awardee. It must also challenge the acceptability of the other lower-priced offerors to have standing to protest the award. See United States v. IBM Corp., 892 F.2d 1006, 1011 (Fed. Cir. 1989); Universal Marine Co., K.S.C. v. United States, 120 Fed. Cl. 240, 248–49 (2015); Hyperion, Inc. v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 541, 550 (2014). The complaint fails to mention the other offerors, and plaintiff cannot satisfy the “interested party” requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) and 31 U.S.C. § 3551(2) with mere speculation that the other offerors cannot perform the requirements at the prices quoted. Moreover, plaintiff has waived any ability to challenge the cancellation of an earlier solicitation of the services being procured, by participating in the subsequent procurement which resulted in the award to intervenor. See Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United States, 492 F.3d 1308, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2007); see also COMINT Sys. Corp. v. United States, 700 F.3d 1377, 1381–82 (Fed. Cir. 2012). As a consequence, the government’s motion to dismiss this case, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Victor J. Wolski VICTOR J. WOLSKI Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?