BREWER v. USA
Filing
34
SCHEDULING ORDER: On or before 2/19/2021, plaintiff is directed to FILE a reply in support of her motion, ECF No. 29 . Absent the filing of a reply brief, the court shall consider plaintiff's motion ripe and a decision will issue in due course. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (dls)
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 19-284T
(Filed: February 12, 2021)
SHIRLEY BREWER
d/b/a EMERALD
GROUP/INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES
LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
On November 9, 2020, plaintiff filed a “motion under RCFC 59 A 1 (a), and or
(B) and 60(B)(1), (5) and (6) requesting [the] court to vacate and/or amend its October 8,
2020 opinion and October 8, 2020, judgment dismissing plaintiff’s amened complaint
with prejudice” in this case. See ECF No. 29. On January 23, 2021, by order of the
court, defendant filed its response brief to plaintiff’s motion. See ECF No. 32. Thus,
plaintiff’s reply in support of her motion was due to be filed by February 1, 2021. As of
the filing of this order, the court has not received plaintiff’s reply.
In light of plaintiff’s pro se status, the court shall afford plaintiff sua sponte an
enlargement of time of seventeen days, to and including February 19, 2021 within which
to file her reply. Absent the filing of a reply brief, the court shall consider plaintiff’s
motion ripe and a decision will issue in due course.
Accordingly, on or before February 19, 2021, plaintiff is directed to FILE a
reply in support of her motion, ECF No. 29.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
PATRICIA E. CAMPBELL-SMITH
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?