GREGORY et al v. USA
Filing
49
Order of Dismissal. Defendant's counterclaims 25 are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(h)(3). The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendant. Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (co) Service on parties made.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 19-386T
Filed: August 18, 2020
CAMERON GREGORY, AND
KATHLEEN GREGORY,
Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant/Counter-Claimant.
ORDER
On August 10, 2020, the Court issued an Opinion granting the United States’ Motion to
Dismiss, pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1), and directing the parties to file a joint status report on or
before August 17, 2020, advising the Court as to how the United States’ counterclaims, advanced
in its Amended Answer, (ECF No. 25), should be resolved. (ECF Nos. 45 & 47). 1 On August 17,
2020, the parties timely filed their joint status report, explaining that they believe this Court lacks
subject matter jurisdiction over the United States’ counterclaims because the jurisdiction to hear
such counterclaims derives from the Court’s jurisdiction over the Complaint, which was
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See ECF No. 48). The Court agrees.
This Court’s jurisdiction over counterclaims derives from its jurisdiction over the original
claims. See Western Mgmt., Inc. v. United States, 498 Fed. Appx. 10, 14 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 2012); 28
U.S.C. §§ 1503, 2508. In this case, the Court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ Complaint for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. (See ECF No. 47). Consequently, the Court lacks subject matter
jurisdiction over the United States’ counterclaims. Therefore, the Court hereby DISMISSES the
United States’ counterclaims, (ECF No. 25), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to
RCFC 12(h)(3).
The Clerk is directed to ENTER judgment dismissing the United States’ counterclaims,
(ECF No. 25), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to RCFC 12(h)(3). The Clerk is
further directed to ENTER final judgment for Defendant, the United States. Each party shall
bear its own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ David A. Tapp
DAVID A. TAPP, Judge
1
This opinion was reissued on August 17, 2020 to correct certain typographical errors. (See ECF
No. 47).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?