CARLTON v. USA
Filing
5
Order of Dismissal. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (ac7) Service on parties made.
llntfn@nitr! $ltatts
@ourt of
fders[
@[ufmg
No. l9-794C
(Filed:July 1,2019)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
)
PHILIP A. CARLTON,
Pro Se
Plaintiff,
)
)
Pro Se; Filing Fee; Failure to
Prosecute.
)
)
)
THE I.INITED STATES,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff, Philip A. Carlton, proceedingpro se, filed the instant complaint on May
29,2019 seeking the court to "enter default" against defendants Chester Water Authority,
Barbara A Cummings, Agnes Woebkenberg, and Robert A Judge for $302,000.00.
Compl. at 6-7. Although the majority of the complaint is difficult to understand, it is clear
that the plaintiff seeks judgment against a water provider in Pennsylvania, the chester
water Authority, and several individuals that work for the chester water Authority.
The plaintiff s complaint was submitted with a $450 check that could not be
processed because it was not issued by a banking institution and had no account or
routing number. on May 31,2019 the plaintiff was notified that the attempted payment
was unsuccessful, and the plaintiff indicated that he would send a money order. The court
has not received a money order from the plaintiff. Because a complaint must be
?81? 1r+50 0000 13'{h 1718
accompanied by either a $400 filing fee pursuant to Rule 77.1(c) ofthe Rules ofthe
United States Court of Federal Claims C'RCFC) or an application to proceed
in
forma
pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $ 1915, and the plaintiff has not submitted either, the
court DISMISSES the plaintiff s complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute
pursuant to RCFC
4l(b) which
states
"[i]f
the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply
with these rules . . ., the court may dismiss on its own motion[.]" The clerk is directed to
dismiss the plaintiff s complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Senior Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?