MAORE v. USA

Filing 11

Order of Dismissal. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (ac7) (Certified Mail 7018 0040 0001 1393 4809)

Download PDF
lin tbe @nitr! 5tstes [,ourt of /e[eru[ @lufms No. 19-1086C (Filed: October 8. 2019) *,t *,t :i * +,t * + * * t :t )t *,t * {< * * * * * * + * * * * r. * MAURICE MWENDA MAORE, r' *' * *'1. T Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES, *'t * * :* * * *,* Defendant. :N *,t'1. :1. * * * :t,t * :t * * rr * * r( * * * :* * t * r( * * * ORDER Plaintiff in the above-captioned case, proceeding pp5e, filed a complaint on July 26, 2019. In a notice issued on July 26, 2019, the clerk ofcourt advised plaintiff that the clerk had not received the required filing fee or a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis ("lFP application"). The court subsequently issued an order to plaintiff on July 31, 2019, directing him either to pay the court's filing fee or to submit the IFP application. On August 6, 2019, plaintiff filed a "Notice of Default" and several enclosures, which were retumed to him unfiled pending his compliance with the court's July 31,2019 order. On August 29,2019, plaintiff filed an IFP application that lacked information regarding his income and financial status. On September 3, 2019,the court issued an order to plaintiff directing him either to pay the court's filing fee or to file a properly completed IFP application by October 2,2019. Additionally, the court cautioned plaintifTthat if he failed to file either the IFP application or pay the court's filing fee, it would dismiss his complaint pursuant to Rule 4l(b) ofthe Rules ofthe United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). As of the date of this order, plaintiff has not complied with the court's orders, Therefore, pursuant to RCFC 41(b), plaintiff s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to complv with the court's orders. No costs. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?