CHARLES v. USA

Filing 6

Order of Dismissal. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Marian Blank Horn. (jm5) Service on parties made. Plaintiff's attorney of record served via certified mail 7018 0040 0001 1393 2447 (rp).

Download PDF
In the United States Court of Federal Claims * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * REYNALD CHARLES, * * Plaintiff, * v. * No. 19-1496C * Filed: October 29, 2019 UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ORDER On September 27, 2019, the United States District Court of the Virgin Islands transferred the above captioned case to the United States Court of Federal Claims, and that same day, September 27, 2019, the case was assigned to the undersigned. Rule 3.1(a)(4) (2019) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) provides that for a case transferred from another court, “[w]ithin 28 days after service of the notice of filing, the plaintiff must file an amended complaint, conforming to the requirements of RCFC 5.5(d)(1) and setting forth the claim or claims transferred.” Therefore, pursuant to RCFC 3.1(a)(4), the transfer complaint in the above captioned case was due on or before October 25, 2019. As indicated in the notice sent to plaintiff, signed by the Clerk of the Court when the record was transferred to this court: “NOTE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ENCLOSED INSTRUCTIONS, WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED, MAY RESULT IN THE CASE BEING DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.” (emphasis and capitalization in original). As of October 29, 2019, plaintiff has not filed a transfer complaint, filed a motion for an enlargement of time to file, or filed any document with the court explaining the delay in complying with the court’s Rules. RCFC 41(b) (2019) states: If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, the court may dismiss on its own motion or the defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not under this rule—except one for lack of jurisdiction or failure to join a party under RCFC 19—operates as an adjudication on the merits. Pursuant to RCFC 41(b), this court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Marian Blank Horn MARIAN BLANK HORN Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?