DOWNEY v. USA
Filing
11
UNREPORTED ORDER granting 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer,; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; on 6 MOTION for Extension of Time until 1/17/2020 to File Answer re 1 Complaint filed by USA, 7 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) filed by USA, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MARK DOWNEY (Response due by 9/18/2020.). Signed by Senior Judge Victor J. Wolski. (jad) Service on parties made.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 19-1707C
(Filed August 17, 2020)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
MARK DOWNEY,
*
*
Plaintiff,
*
*
v.
*
*
THE UNITED STATES,
*
*
Defendant.
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
ORDER
Defendant’s motion for an enlargement of the time period in which to file its
response to the complaint is GRANTED, as defendant has made the requisite
showing of good cause --- namely a delay in gaining access to the complaint.
Plaintiff’s requests for default judgment and for sanctions are DENIED. Defendant
timely moved for an enlargement of time, thus precluding any basis for entry of a
default judgment under Rules 6(b)(1) and 55(a) of the Rules of the United States
Court of Federal Claims. See James A. Williams Tr. v. United States, No. 10-753T,
2011 WL 477811, at *1 (Fed. Cl. Feb. 11, 2011). Regarding the request for
sanctions, plaintiff has failed to plausibly allege any misrepresentations to the
tribunal, or any other basis upon which sanctions may be imposed. Plaintiff shall
file his response to the motion to dismiss the complaint on or by Friday,
September 18, 2020. Additionally, Mr. Downey’s application to proceed in forma
pauperis is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?