Whitney Information, et al v. Xcentric Ventures, et al

Filing 187

NOTICE by Xcentric Ventures, LLC, Badbusinessbureau.org, Ed Magedson Notice of Additional Defense Exhibit After Filing of Joint Pretrial Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 3.06(e), and Motion for Order Allowing Exhibit in Furtherance of Justice (Speth, Maria)

Download PDF
Maria Crimi Speth, #012574 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JABURG & WILK, P.C. 3200 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WHITNEY INFORMATION NETWORK, INC.; a Colorado corporation, Plaintiffs, v. XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; BADBUSINESSBUREAU.ORG, an Arizona limited liability company; and ED MAGEDSON, an individual, Case No: 2:04-CV-47-ftm-29 NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL DEFENSE EXHIBIT AFTER FILING OF JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 3.06(e), AND MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING EXHIBIT IN FURTHERANCE OF JUSTICE Defendants. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, (“Xcentric”), and Ed Magedson (“Magedson”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) give notice of an additional Defense Exhibit added after the filing of the Joint Pretrial Memorandum. Exhibit 318 is a CNN video news story by Gregg Hunter about Plaintiff, Whitney Information Network, Inc. (“WIN”). This news story was first published today. (See http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/02/14/hunter.millionaire.university.cnn ) The report demonstrated WIN’s public reputation, past, present, and future. The video includes segments of interview with Florida’s Attorney General, Bill McCollum, in which Mr. McCollum explains how WIN “rips off” consumers. Pursuant to Local Rule 3.06(e), this exhibit can be added upon order of the Court in furtherance of justice. It would further justice to use this news story as evidence at 10297-8/ASK/ASK/638194_v1 trial even though it was not on the exhibit list because the news story was not available to Defendants until today. Further, the news story accurately and succinctly reflects WIN’s reputation prior to the release of the report, and as news story prepared and released by on of the nations most prominent news agencies, it defines WIN’s reputation in the future. Conversely, it would be completely unjust to conduct a trial without considering how this report both confirms and continues WIN’s national reputation, when WIN accuses defendants of damaging WIN’s reputation by some text postings on a webpage for consumer complaints and when the news story did not exist until today and, thus, could not have been included in the previous exhibit list. For the reasons stated, Defendants request an order allowing Exhibit 318 to be presented at trial. I certify that my associate conferred with opposing counsel about this issue, and opposing counsel stated their intention to object to including Exhibit 318. DATED February 14, 2008. By: /s/ Maria Crimi Speth Maria Crimi Speth Arizona Bar No.: 012574 Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 3200 N. Central Ave. Suite 2000 Phoenix, AZ 85012 602-248-1000 Attorneys for Defendants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 14th day of February, 2008, I electronically filed the forgoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing is being served this day upon all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic 2 10297-8/ASK/ASK/638194_v1 Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. Steven Neil Lippman Shawn L. Birken Scott W. Rothstein Rothstein Rosenfeld Adler Suite 1650 401 E Las Olas Blvd Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Plaintiff Brian J. Stack Stack, Fernandez, Anderson, Harris & Wallace, P.A. 1200 Brickell Ave., Suite 950 Miami, FL 33131-3255 Attorneys for Defendant /s/ Maria Crimi Speth Maria Crimi Speth 3 10297-8/ASK/ASK/638194_v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?