USA v. Tract J31-25
OPINION AND ORDER that the government has the right to condemn the subject property and just compensation is $3,800.00 ($1,500 per acre, rounded to the nearest 100). The government shall deposit the just compensation into the Registry with in 60 days of this Opinion and Order. The government shall timely move for final judgment upon deposit, and the Clerk shall administratively close the file pending the entry of final judgment. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/14/2009. (RKM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:08-cv-193-FtM-29SPC
TRACT J31-25, 2.5 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DAVID LIMA, ET AL., Defendant. ___________________________________ OPINION AND ORDER This matter came before the Court on October 13, 2009, for a bench trial on the matter of just compensation in 33 condemnation proceedings. All parties known or believed by plaintiff to have an
interest in the property have been properly served or notified as provided by FED. R. CIV. P. 71.1. No property owner or claimant
appeared at trial except for Mr. Milton Kent in Case Number 2:08cv-245-FTM-99DNF and Mr. Kenneth Brown in Case Number 2:08-cv-256FTM-29SPC. The Both Mr. Kent and Mr. Brown testified. heard testimony from John R. Underwood, Jr.,
President and owner of Appraisal and Acquisition Consultants, Inc. since 1983, who testified on behalf of the government regarding the appraised value of the parcels of land subject to condemnation proceedings. Mr. Underwood started his career as an appraiser in
1971 working for First Federal Savings & Loan of Lake Worth, Florida. Mr. Underwood received training from the Society of Real
Estate Appraisers, and the Appraisal Institute.
received his MAI (general) designation in 1981, which requires a minimum of 5 years experience and peer review, and his SRA
(residental) designation in 1979, from the Appraisal Institute. In compliance with continuing education obligations, Mr. Underwood must complete 30 hours every 2 years for the State of Florida and 100 hours every 5 years for the Appraisal Institute to maintain the designations. Mr. Underwood has previously testified and was
qualified as an expert in excess of 100 times, over approximately 50 cases in condemnation cases, including on behalf of homeowners. Mr. Underwood has appraised office buildings to wetlands, and has conducted about 1000 appraisals in the everglades and 200 in the Big Cypress project. The Big Cypress National Preserve was An
established in the early 1980s to protect flora and fauna. expansion of Big Cypress was Congressionally authorized.
Mr. Underwood testified as to the common characteristics of the land as: (1) wetlands; (2) similarly zoned; (3) difficult to Appraisal was
access; and (4) all located in the expansion area.
conducted by air to determine market value using a sales comparison approach after rejecting the cost and income approaches as
The market value was determined by comparing to
sales in the Fakahatchee Strand, where the market is limited, the values range from a low of $800.00 to a high of $2,000.00, and sales were by negotiation with the State. The subject tracts all
have the highest and best use of passive recreational, meaning the -2-
land can be enjoyed but regulations prohibit development. taking has yet occurred in any of these cases.
The oil and gas
rights were not and will not be taken as part of the tracts of land, however, the mineral rights will be taken even though no commercial viability is known. The Court, having considered the testimony and other evidence, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES: 1. The Plaintiff has the right to condemn the subject
properties for the public purpose set forth in the Complaints in Condemnation. 2. Just Compensation for the taking of the fee simple title
to Property, is $1,500.00 per acre, rounded up to the nearest 100, for a total value of $3,800.00. Payment of the Just Compensation
will be in full satisfaction of any and all claims of whatsoever nature against the Plaintiff by reason of the institution and prosecution of this action and taking of the subject properties. 3. Plaintiff will deposit the Just Compensation determined at trial into the Registry of the Court within SIXTY (60) DAYS of this Order. The Clerk shall administratively close the file pending the entry of final judgment. 4. On the date of the deposit of the Just Compensation into
the Registry of the Court, title to the Property will vest in the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff will be entitled to immediate
possession of the Property.
Upon making such deposit, Plaintiff
will timely notify the Court and move for a final judgment of condemnation by filing a motion. 5. The Just Compensation will be subject to all real estate
taxes, liens and encumbrances of whatsoever nature existing against the Property at the time of vesting the title thereto in the Plaintiff and all such taxes, liens, encumbrances of whatsoever nature will be payable and deductible from the Just Compensation. 6. The Clerk of the Court will retain the deposited Just
Compensation until further Order of this Court upon consideration of any applications for distribution filed by persons claiming or asserting an interest in the Just Compensation. Plaintiff's
counsel shall notify the Clerk of the Court as each remaining case reaches a zero balance so that the case may be closed. 7. In the event that the Just Compensation and any interest,
or any part thereof, remains unclaimed for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS from the date of this Opinion and Order, the Clerk of the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2042, will cause such sum, together with any interest, to be deposited in the United States Treasury in the name and to the credit of the United States of America or the National Park Service, as appropriate. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this October, 2009. 14th day of
Copies: Kyle Scott Cohen, AUSA Counsel of Record Parties of record Intake Finance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?