D'Aprile v. Unum Group et al

Filing 167

ORDER. Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Supplemental Protective Order (Doc. #165) on or before December 6, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/2/2010. (LMH)

Download PDF
D'Aprile v. Unum Group et al Doc. 167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION DENISE B. D'APRILE, Plaintiff, -vsUNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. ______________________________________ Case No. 2:09-cv-270-FtM-36SPC ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Supplemental Protective Order (Doc. #165) filed on December 1, 2010. Plaintiff asserts that she is unable to redact client names in the QuickBooks backup file that she was ordered to produce by November 26, 2010. Plaintiff has proposed two alternative means of producing the backup file to Defendant that would redact the client names, to which Defendant has not agreed. Plaintiff, an attorney, believes that if the file is produced with unredacted client names, she will be in violation of Florida Bar Rule 4-1.6. The Court will order that Defendant to respond to the instant Motion and inform the Court how it believes the QuickBooks backup file with the names redacted that is still in a form that is usable for its purposes should be produced. If Defendant believes it is entitled to the unredacted backup file, Defendant shall provide the Court with authority for this assertion and respond to Plaintiff's concerns regarding Florida Bar Rule 4-1.6. The Court is confident that the Parties can work together to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution to this issue. Accordingly, it is now Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Supplemental Protective Order (Doc. #165) on or before December 6, 2010. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 2nd day of December, 2010. Copies: All Parties of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?