D'Aprile v. Unum Group et al

Filing 210

ORDER. Equitas Disability Advocates Reply in Support of Enforcement of Charging Lien (Doc. #208) is STRIKEN. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike Doc. #208 from the docket sheet.Equitas shall have up to and including July 15, 2011 to file a reply brief in support of its Motion to Adjudicate and Enforce Attorneys Charging Lien of no more than 10 pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/8/2011. (LMH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
DENISE B. D'APRILE,
Plaintiff,
-vs-

Case No. 2:09-cv-270-FtM-36SPC

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
AMERICA,
Defendant.
______________________________________
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Equitas Disability Advocates’ Reply in Support of
Enforcement of Charging Lien (Doc. #208) filed on July 6, 2011. The Court notes that Equitas’
Reply Brief is 17 pages in length, even though the Court specifically told Equitas that its Reply Brief
in support of its Motion to Adjudicate and Enforce Attorneys’ Charging Lien should be no more than
10 pages in its June 29, 2011 Order. (Doc. #204, ¶ 1). Therefore, as Equitas’ Reply was in
contravention of this Court’s Order, it is due to be striken.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
(1)

Equitas Disability Advocates’ Reply in Support of Enforcement of Charging Lien

(Doc. #208) is STRIKEN. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike Doc. #208 from the docket sheet.
(2)

Equitas shall have up to and including July 15, 2011 to file a reply brief in support

of its Motion to Adjudicate and Enforce Attorneys’ Charging Lien of no more than 10 pages.
DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this

Copies: All Parties of Record

8th

day of July, 2011.