Esposito v. Hollander et al

Filing 27

OPINION AND ORDER denying 2 Motion to appoint counsel; denying as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; adopting in part 13 Report and Recommendations and otherwise finding moot; denying as moot 21 Motion for summary judgment. The 26 Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within 21 days. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 12/22/2009. (RKM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION RALPH H. ESPOSITO, JR., Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD HOLLANDER; RUTH SAMELSON, EDWARD Case No. MILLER; 2:09-cv-728-FtM-29SPC ___________________________________ OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes to before Dismiss the Court #6) on and consideration the Report of and defendants' Motion (Doc. Recommendation (Doc. #13) recommending that plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #2) be denied and the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice, with leave for plaintiff to file an amended complaint. to the Report and Plaintiff filed Written Objections (Doc. #24) Recommendation, but also filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. #26). In light of Plaintiff also filed a Notice (Doc. #22). the Amended Complaint, the Report and Recommendation and the Motion to Dismiss are moot. however, review the Amended Complaint for The Court will, subject matter jurisdiction and pleading sufficiency. Read liberally because of plaintiff's pro se status, the Amended Complaint (Doc. #26) alleges legal malpractice by members of the law firm which represented plaintiff in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and cannot act outside their statutory subject-matter jurisdiction. University of S. Ala. v. Am. Tobacco, 168 F.3d 405, While the Amended Complaint makes 409-410 (11th Cir. 1999). reference to the First Amendment, no cause of action is stated under the First Amendment or any other U.S. Constitutional provision or federal law, and therefore no jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Additionally, all parties are citizens of Florida, and therefore not jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). University of S. Ala. v. Am. Tobacco, 168 F.3d at 412. It appears, however, that the district court has subject matter jurisdiction because the legal malpractice claim is based on plaintiff's attorney's handling of his bankruptcy case, and thus "arises under" Title 11 for purposes of federal jurisdiction. Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLC, 569 F.3d 485, 489 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Heck-Dance v. Cardona-Jimenez, 102 Fed. Appx. 171, 171-72 (1st Cir. 2004); Grausz v. Englander, 321 F.3d 467 (4th Cir. 2003); Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand (In re Southmark Corp.), 163 F.3d 925 (5th Cir. 1999); Billing v. Ravin, Greenberg & Zackin, P.A., 22 F.3d 1242, 1244 (3d Cir. 1994). The Amended Complaint clearly fails to properly state any cause of action against any defendant. with the filing instructions Plaintiff has not complied in the Report and provided Recommendation (Doc. #13, pp. 5-6), and even liberally construed, the Amended Complaint is insufficient. Plaintiff will be given one last opportunity to adequately set forth his cause(s) of action -2- with the supporting facts and allegations set forth in the document to be entitled "Second Amended Complaint." Any exhibits should be attached at the end of the Second Amended Complaint. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #13) is ADOPTED IN PART as to appointment of counsel and is otherwise MOOT. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #2) is DENIED. 3. 4. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #21) is DENIED AS MOOT. 5. The Amended Complaint (Doc. #26) is DISMISSED WITHOUT Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint setting PREJUDICE. forth all his cause(s) of action within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this December, 2009. 22nd day of Copies: U.S. Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Counsel of record -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?